Source: Security.NL
A large Belgian tech company has received a total fine of 176,000 euro from the Belgian Data Protection Authority (GBA) for failing to delete the email mailbox of a former employee in time. The GBA announced the decision on 12 May 2026, according to Security.NL. The name of the company has not been made public.
According to Security.NL, the former employee discovered that her old work mailbox was still active after she had left the company. She asked the company to give her access to the mailbox and to delete it. Despite her request, the company reportedly failed to act properly.
The GBA found that the company had kept the mailbox active for at least a year after the employee's departure, which the authority considered unlawful. The company reportedly argued that retaining the mailbox was justified based on the former employee's role, but the GBA did not accept this reasoning as sufficient grounds for keeping the mailbox active for such a long period.
According to Security.NL, the GBA identified several violations:
The fine breaks down into two parts: 160,000 euro for the unlawful data processing and 16,000 euro for failing to meet the transparency obligation, bringing the total to 176,000 euro.
This case is a reminder that data protection rules do not only apply to customer data. They also cover the personal data of your own staff and former staff. When someone leaves your business, their data does not automatically become yours to keep indefinitely.
If you are unsure whether your business handles employee data correctly, our GDPR compliance checklist is a good place to start. You can also read more about how fines are applied to smaller businesses in our guide to GDPR fines.
While this case involves an internal email system rather than a website, the underlying rules apply to any personal data your business holds. If your website collects contact details, booking information or staff data, you need a clear policy for how long you keep that data and how you delete it when it is no longer needed. Your privacy policy should reflect this honestly, so that people know what happens to their information.
Free website scan covering GDPR, copyright, accessibility, security, and more.
Start free checkDutch legal blog Ius Mentis explains that GDPR makes it legally impossible to obtain valid consent for personal data use through terms of service or general conditions, and that Article 7(2) GDPR…
On 19 March 2026, the CJEU ruled in Case C-526/24 (Brillen Rottler) that a data subject's first DSAR can be refused as 'excessive' under Article 12(5) GDPR if the controller can demonstrate abusive…
The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens) published a draft enforcement policy for public consultation, inviting responses by 17 May 2026.