Skip to content
TrustYourWebsite
What We CheckFree ToolsLearnPricingAbout
Menu
What We CheckFree ToolsLearnPricingAboutSample ReportNews

Settings

Country

Language

NederlandsFrançaisEnglish
Scan Free
TrustYourWebsite

Intelligent scanner for European websites.

Resources

  • Learning Hub
  • Guides
  • By Industry
  • By Country
  • News
  • Cookie Checker
  • Privacy Policy Generator

Product

  • Pricing
  • Sample Report
  • About
  • Open source

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Imprint
  • Report accessibility issue

© 2026 TrustYourWebsite. Built in the Netherlands. Chamber of Commerce (NL): 42030553 · VAT: NL005443213B36

Supervisory authority: GBA / APD (BE) · AP (NL) as lead supervisory authority

Digital service, available immediately after payment. No shipping costs.

Home/News/EU Age Verification App Guidance for 2026
GDPR

EU Age Verification App Guidance for 2026

By TrustYourWebsite Editorial21 May 20262 min read

Source: Ius Mentis

The European Commission is advising EU member states to start using an EU age verification app by the end of 2026, according to a blog post by Ius Mentis, which references Nu.nl as its original source. The guidance is connected to rules around the European Digital Identity Wallet, based on Regulation 2024/1183, sometimes referred to as eIDAS 2.0.

What is the age verification app?

According to Ius Mentis, the app is designed to let people share their age or an age status with online services in a privacy-friendly way, without having to send copies of a passport or ID card. The wallet behind it works as a kind of digital safe where people can store identity credentials. One feature allows users to prove they are over 18 without revealing their actual date of birth.

It is worth noting that Regulation 2024/1183, Article 5bis paragraph 15, sets a clear limit: access to essential services cannot be made dependent on identification through the wallet.

Meta and the DSA

The guidance arrives alongside a separate development. According to Ius Mentis, Meta is reportedly subject to a preliminary finding that it is in breach of Article 32 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) because it carries out no age checks for minors. This is described as a preliminary assessment, not a final decision, and it is not yet clear whether any formal ruling or fine has followed. The suggestion from the Commission appears to be that platforms like Meta should use the age verification app to address this kind of concern.

Because the source for all of this is a secondary blog post rather than a primary official document, and because the exact date of the Commission's advice is not stated, these details should be treated with some caution.

What does this mean for your website?

If your website or online service is accessible to minors, age verification is becoming an area of increasing regulatory attention at EU level. While this guidance is currently directed at member states and large platforms, the broader direction of travel suggests that online services of all sizes may eventually need to think about how they handle age-related access. For now, making sure your privacy policy and data practices are in order is a sensible first step, and our GDPR compliance checklist and privacy policy requirements guide are good places to start.

Share this article

Check your website now

Free website scan covering GDPR, copyright, accessibility, security, and more.

Start free check

Related articles

GDPR

Belgian Tech Firm Fined 176k for Keeping Ex-Employee Mailbox

A large Belgian tech company received a total fine of 176,000 euro from the Belgian Data Protection Authority for failing to timely delete the mailbox of a former female employee.

17 May 20262 min read
GDPR

GDPR Consent Rules: Why Terms of Service Fail

Dutch legal blog Ius Mentis explains that GDPR makes it legally impossible to obtain valid consent for personal data use through terms of service or general conditions, and that Article 7(2) GDPR…

16 May 20262 min read
GDPR

CJEU Ruling: First-Time DSAR Refusal Allowed

On 19 March 2026, the CJEU ruled in Case C-526/24 (Brillen Rottler) that a data subject's first DSAR can be refused as 'excessive' under Article 12(5) GDPR if the controller can demonstrate abusive…

14 May 20262 min read